View Single Post
  #304  
Old December 23rd 03, 12:27 PM
Fred J. McCall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

pervect wrote:

:On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:29:52 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
:
:pervect wrote:
:
::Actually there's something I forgot to mention - using similar spread
::spectrum techniques as, for instance, GPS, it will in general be
::fairly hard to tell that a high tech wide bandwidth low power
::transmitter is "up" at all.
:
:So we've established the following so far in this discussion:
:
:1) Tanks can't kill anything, since it can dodge.
:
:2) ECM doesn't work.
:
:There was another equally silly one, but I forget what it was. No
:matter.
:
:Even trolls should know more about their subject than we're seeing
:demonstrated here.
:
:If you think tanks can't kill anything, you might want to explain how
:you came to that conclusion, it isn't very apparent to me.

Oh, *I* don't think that. However, 'your' side has made the argument
that tank-killing SUVs are practically because tanks can't hit them,
as "all they have to do is dodge by half their vehicle width".

:For extra credit, you might try explaining how the issue of whether or
:not "tanks can kill anything" has anything to do with what I actually
:said about the difficulty of detecting spread spectrum signals.

It doesn't. It's merely another silly contention coming from 'your'
side of the argument. Yours is "ECM can't work".

--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney