Why are low-revving, high torque engines preferred?
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
"jan olieslagers"  wrote in message  
... 
 Oliver Arend schreef: 
 At the risk of feeding the trolls: 
 There are several examples of the setup you describe. 
 The Rotax 4-stroke engines have a (belt?) reduction. 
 In Europe one sees more and more BMW-motorcycle engines 
 driving planes through a reduction, either gear or belt. 
 
There are also several versions of Lycoming / Contintntal / other "brand  
name" aircraft engines with reduction units. 
 
Adds cost, complexity, and can result in durability issues (one more thing  
to go wrong). 
 
Sometimes it works out better, sometimes not. It all depends on the details  
of your objectives. 
 
For extra points - why do Ford V8's have overhead cams and Chevy V8's tend  
towards pushrods - you would thing that one would be "better", right? Why  
are they different? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Because Ford management gives the engine designers a "horsepower per  
displacement" objective and Chevy magement gives them a "horsepower per  
package volume" objective. 
 
(per engine guys who have worked at both shops) 
 
--  
Geoff 
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com 
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail 
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.  
 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |