View Single Post
  #355  
Old December 24th 03, 05:01 PM
Derek Lyons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Charles Gray wrote:

And required maitenance and was no where near a "store and fire"
weapon. You would need fueling facilities and that means taht "wooden
rounds" where you simply stick it in a container until you need to
shoot, are right out.


And that's the big sticking point with a defense system built around
garage built el cheapo vunderveapons. I'll buy that you could
assemble them and fire them off, and get a flyaway cost under $10K and
a PK of .25 or so. But I won't buy that the same will hold true once
the weapons are stored a month or two, or a couple of years.

D.
--
The STS-107 Columbia Loss FAQ can be found
at the following URLs:

Text-Only Version:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq.html

Enhanced HTML Version:
http://www.io.com/~o_m/columbia_loss_faq_x.html

Corrections, comments, and additions should be
e-mailed to , as well as posted to
sci.space.history and sci.space.shuttle for
discussion.