On Jan 4, 6:25Â*am, Martin Hotze wrote:
Beauciphus schrieb:

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
.. .

That's because I'm not a troll.

And you've never had a blog either.

Both are false statements.

wouldn't it be great if you all would save your breath in answering this
idiot?

Mx is famous for his assumptive knowledge. The definition of
assumption follows:


as·sump·tion [ ə súmpshən ] (plural as·sump·tions)

noun
Definition:

1. something taken for granted: something that is believed to be true
without proof

2. belief without proof: the belief that something is true without
having any proof

3. act of undertaking something: the act of taking something upon
yourself

4. acceptance of responsibility for something: the act of taking over
responsibility for something

5. inclination to high expectations: the tendency to expect too much

6. logic unproved starting point: something taken as a starting point
of a logical proof rather than given as a premise

[13th century. Latin assumption- assumpt-, past participle of
assumere (see assume)]

Consider points 1, 2, and 6. Mx assumes he knows everything
already and is therefore unteachable. There's no refuting him, so
there's no point arguing. He's either just trolling for reactions, or
has a complex of some sort. Why do we bother?

Dan