View Single Post
  #2  
Old December 27th 03, 05:46 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Duster" wrote in message
m...
Could you point me to the thread? This sounds intersting...

Duster

This has been an "On Going" exchange in many threads over a period of time.

Tarver being an EE can't get a grip on the concept that the "explosive
limits of fuel vapours in the Uleage of CWT's" vary with temp, pressure, &
air content as the vent system functions.

The normal protocal for ADA is to "Bottom Post", makeing it much easier to
follow.

Be warned to expect less than "Courterous Treatment" when dealing with
Tarver aka "Splaps Boy/Splappy" the self described font of all knowledge
things A/C & Aviation. If you do not believe this, just ask him.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
.. .

"Duster" wrote in message
. ..
Holy **** and all I wanted was a video... hehe this is almost better
though..

Duster

Tarver cannot get it through his head that having the air handling units
operating under the CWT when the A/C is stationary is like putting a
pressure cooker with a small amount of fuel in it, on a stove at low

heat.

There have been several incidents world wide where Boeing A/C of various
models have exploded sitting at gates, on ramps, taxing out, or shortly
after take off after sitting with the air handling units running under ~
empty CWT's.

There are now "Air Safety Directives" stipulating/requiring certain
operating protocols to minimize this hazard associated with the "Boeing

CWT
Design Philosophy".
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type