View Single Post
  #43  
Old December 28th 03, 12:35 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
y.com...
Please note "Splaps Boy" is the one screaming "Bomb" not be.

You write "bomb" WRT the 747 on a regular basis, Ralph. If I were an
archive troll, I'd wager there are over 100 instances where Ralph

posted
"bomb" in 747 threads WRT the 747 CWT. (all references to "wager"

exclude
the no-pay mazor sock)

Is that per your interpretation, or mine?


It is your own posted words, Nesbitt. You are a nut, out trashing the

747,
but somehow hurling insults at me will make you right; only on usenet.

Google is the official historian of ADA. Show me where I have mentioned the
word "Bomb" regarding this issue, other than in response to your hard
headed, contentious stupidity.

"Get Your Head Out of Where Ever, Clear Anything Which May Blur/Cloud Your
Vision, Then Clear Your Head, as in Get Some Fresh Air," so you may look at
the "Demonstrated Inherently Dangerous Issues" associated with "The Boeing
CWT Design Issue".

That "Inherently Dangerous Conditions" during specified flight
segments/operations exist continuously has been demonstrated by incidents in
the fleet, verified scientifically, & validated in/under real world
operating condition.

To eliminate/limit the "Inherently Dangerous Conditions" common to all
Boeing A/C CWT's, Boeing along/in co-operation with "Regulators & Safety
Oversight Groups" world wide came up with a set of operating protocols
designed to "Limit the Inherent Danger" built into the "Basic Boeing CWT
Design".

Above is a reiteration of my position on the Boeing CWT Design Issue".

The above is a "Fact of Life". Accept it & move on.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type