pervect wrote:
:On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:27:28 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
:
:pervect wrote:
:
::On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 05:29:52 GMT, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
::
::pervect wrote:
:
:
::If you think tanks can't kill anything, you might want to explain how
::you came to that conclusion, it isn't very apparent to me.
:
:Oh, *I* don't think that. However, 'your' side has made the argument
:that tank-killing SUVs are practically because tanks can't hit them,
:as "all they have to do is dodge by half their vehicle width".
:
:I hadn't realized we were picking teams. Who else do you think is on
:"my" side,
The gentleman proposing the magical technology cruise missile and
various other 'technological' fixes for problems the guy fighting the
US will encounter, of course.
:and for that matter, who is on yours?
All the sane people who recognize that 'asymmetric warfare' doesn't
mean trying to beat the other guy at his own game, particularly when
it takes 'magic' technology to do it.
--
"Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute."
-- Charles Pinckney
|