If you read the rules you will find that it is the ASH-26 that is at a
competitive disadvantage at a no-water contest, not the Diana.

This is because the lighter gliders are allowed to add fixed ballast, while
the heavier machines have no way to get rid of it. In a weak weather contest
the Diana has the advantage while the 26 grovels, but in a strong weather
contest they are equal.

Point two: The rules for nationals provide for a no-water day to be called
only for compelling circumstances, that is to say weak. Here again, the
lighter glider would be at an advantage.

Karl Striedieck


"AK" wrote in message
...
Nationals can now declare a “No ballast” day without all pilots
agreeing.

A motor glider or a heavy glider will have a considerable advantage
especially on a good day if this rule is not modified.

Here is an example, imagine Diana 2 (420 lb empty with instruments)
competing with ASG-29 15 m (620 lb empty with instruments). A no water
day was called.

Wing loading for each glider in a typical configuration (180 lb pilot
weight)

Diana 2 – 6.45 lb/sq foot.
ASG-29 15 m – 8.08 lb/sq foot

Diana 2 pilot does not have a chance. This glider needs some water to
fly at the same wing loading as other heavier gliders. There are more
examples I could give but I think my point is clear.

Please put a restriction on wing loading for those days when no tow
pilot wants to tow a fully loaded glider rather than declaring a “No
ballast day”

The intention of this rule was good no one wants to loose a day, but
please don't create losers.

AK