Fred J. McCall wrote:

It would also not be asymmetric warfare. This is attempting to play
the big guy's game. He will virtually always beat you at it. That's
why it's a mug's game.

We've now added invisible anti-aircraft installations and lots of deep
caves to the mix with the magic technology cruise missile.

You have no idea how silly all this sounds to people who actually
build weapons.

"Asymmetric warfare" against the current US warfighting capability would
be a bit difficult, if you try to stick with standard tactics. The
easier move would be intelligence/espionage.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.