On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:27:19 -0800, VOR-DME wrote:
In article ,
says...
That doesn't make any sense. Why would a newbie pilot need to
transition from anything? I've never transitioned a pilot from glass
to steam (doesn't happen very often) but I would imagine that it would
be difficult. The glass takes a lot of the "scan and interpret" away
from the flying duties. Going back to steam means that you need to
look at several instruments and develop a mental picture of what is
happening.
-Robert, CFII
My thoughts exactly.
Without supporting documentation from the original author, we have to take this
as a flippant affirmation. . .
I'm the OP, here's the opening post.
================================================== ============
In the past few years, one (supposedly) successful flight training
school dumped their Cessna fleet for Diamonds.
http://www.eaa-fly.com/Training/Training.html
I believe they do not have any aircraft that with standard, "steam"
instrumentation. Regardless, the conversation turns quickly to
"Is this a good way to go about training for your PPL?"
Since most rentals, especially lower priced ones, are Cessna 15x/17x,
the transition (backwards so to speak to glass) would appear to be an
issue.
My expectation is that the majority of newbies to flying look
forward to curbing not inflating costs and that they will need to be
Cessna (std gauging) prepared not glass panel prepared.
Comments appreciated.