View Single Post
  #42  
Old January 30th 09, 01:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting,alt.disasters.aviation,alt.usenet.kooks
Bertie the Bunyip[_28_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 481
Default Hypothesis on USAir birdstrike

"Maxwell" #$$9#@%%%.^^^ wrote in :


"Bertie the Bunyip" wrote in message
...
Eeyore wrote in
:



Bertie the Bunyip wrote:

(Steve Pope) wrote vaughn
wrote:

The absence of immediate evidence to the contrary does not
in any way make "some design flaw or maintenance issue of the
other engine" likely. It is possible I suppose, but not likely.
Remember, "conventional wisdom" is sometimes spectacularly

wrong,
but it is dangerous to bet against it.

Sure, although I'm not sure "conventional wisdom" states that
each engine ingesting a bird simultaneously is all that likely
either.

Yeah it is actualy.

Statistically it is simply the square of a single bird strike.

Probably
plus some other factors to make it more likely because birds often

fly
in flocks.

Graham

Now Bertei is removing groups ! sigh


Netkkkoping fjukktard.


Bertie



Wanna be retard.



Guide me oh master.

Bertie