"Scott M. Kozel" wrote in message
...
"Idiot" wrote:

"Pooh Bear" wrote:
Jim Knoyle wrote:

Uh ?

Knoyle doesn't remember anything Graham, he just spews.

Pot, kettle, black.

Not the case, Kozel, the fuel tank differences between the 737 and 747 are
well known and the AD to the 737 fuel tank is also well known and public.

Which proves once and for all, you can point an idiot to an
Airworthyness
Directive, but you can't expect him to be able to read it.

Pot, kettle, black.

For Jimmy troll to claim to be ex-United, is especially a hoot, as United
didn't bother "inspecting and replacing the bundle as necessary", but
replaced every single suspect bundle in every suspect 737 they flew.

That is, of course, the reason the pre and some -300 737s have a higher
incidence of CWT problems and also completely different from a 747 CWT.