"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Thanks for verifying/validating a "Consistent Boeing CWT Design
Philosophy"
used on all Boeing Models with CWT's.

It is my understanding Boeing has changed it's "CWT Design Philosophy"
to
minimize/eliminate the "Inherent Danger" of the older "Design
Philosophy.

Why would Knoyle have any knowledge of any "design philosophy", for any
airplane, anywhere in this universe?

People who work with/around numerous things in whatever capacity have
numerous reasons to have a "broad basic understanding of the "Design
Philosophy" of what ever they are working with.

Knoyle has created an entire archive of his own misunderstandings of how an
airplane works. Therefore your attempt to draw credibility for your
statements that the 747 CWT is a "bomb", can not come from Jimmy.

Once again, Ralph, Boeing made some boost pump wire bundles for early 737s
that run throuh the CWT too short, that error created a "source of
ignition"; but it has absolutely nothing to do with the 747 CWT. The bundle
is not only lacking a "too short" error for the 747 boost pumps, but the
bundle is also routed differently.