Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: Wake up, Chad. It doesn't even have to 'miss'. What range is given
: for it? Where? What load conditions? How much fuel? Any tanks?
: What assumptions about flight regime? How much 'draggier' is the 'big
: wing' (apparently enough to not give a range increase, if the
: 'handwaving' numbers are to be believed, since they don't call the C
: out separately (nor the B either, for that matter)).
:
:You know, I already explained the comparison. I explained where I got
:the numbers.

You've claimed several different provenances for your numbers. The
only explicit one was FAS. I posted elsewhere what you get using
their numbers - F-35 with shorter range than F/A-18E/F.

:And all you can manage is arguing against your *own* arguments.

Is English your second language? Are you part of that generation that
never actually learned how to read? Those are the only two excuses I
can find for your preceding statement.

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn