Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: Ah, my apologies. I did misread that one. Now, funny how you still
: avoid any self-commentary on all YOUR misread (and, apparently,
: outright made up) numbers.
:
:Because most of what you've been calling "misread" is due to very
:selective reading on your part, or a refusal to actually look at the
:numbers.

No, most of what I've been calling 'misread' is due to you not reading
what is written to you. Have you answered ANY questions put to you
with regard to your claims? Sources for your 'official' numbers?
Source for claimed 'bring back' of the F-35C? Of course not. That
would require actually being responsive rather than just flaming over
this imaginary strawman you keep attributing to me.

:What it comes down to is that you think the F-35 will miss its
erformance targets by a huge amount, and that you haven't got a reason
:for it other than pure paranoia.

No, what it comes down to is you've selected your strawman argument to
get impassioned about and are simply disregarding anything that is
said to you.

I'm sure you'll understand if I return the favour. So, which part of
LockMart marketing do you work for, by the way?

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn