In article ,
says...


-b- writes:

But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it.

I'll worry about that when I'm in the market for an airplane.

I'm sure that more traditional avionics are available for those willing to pay
for them. I'm not willing to entrust my life to a single unproven ball of
software.


Well, you could at least take a chance - because as soon as you quit the
application you get your life back! But I guess that's not getting much back,
is it?

Technical question : What part of G1000 is unproven, and where's the "ball"?