In article , #$$9#@%%%.^^^ says...



"-b-" wrote in message
...
In article , #$$9#@%%%.^^^ says...



"-b-" wrote in message
.. .
In article , #$$9#@%%%.^^^ says...



"-b-" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,

says...



"-b-" wrote
Yours is the very definition of an out of context post.
MX has made it clear that he is not interested in the FAA's
definition
of
a
simulator or fligght training device, but focuses on its
functionalities.
Collins cites functionalities to circumscribe the usefulness of
these
devices,
and you comme back to FAA definitions!! Let's call in Kafka to
clarify!!


You must be new here.



From what I'm seeing, I take that as a compliment.


From what we are seeing, that's not what was intended.



Intentions may be obscure, arguments explicit. The latter being
weak......an you extremely stupid.

Intentions become more explicit, arguments weaker.

Geez,,,,,you're almost as astute as Mixie himself. You simmers are all
alike.



Simulation is not the question here, but your own inability to grasp the
subjet at hand is most disconcerting, and would certainly not be conducive
to safe piloting skills.