Thread
:
*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********
View Single Post
#
89
March 8th 09, 07:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
Posts: 9,169
*********A DEFENCE FOR MXMORAN***********
writes:
I'll type this real slow so you have a better chance of understanding
the concepts involved, though you may still have to read it several
times to understand.
The speed at which you type it has no effect on the speed at which I read it,
since I will see it only after you've entirely finished typing it.
If the accuracy of a manuever by a real pilot in a real airplane satisfies
the accuracy requirements of the real ATC controller, nothing is said about
the manuever.
If a pilot doesn't know the accuracy of his maneuver, it doesn't make much
sense for him to boast about it.
Since I received no feedback from the tower on the accuracy of my manuever,
the final arbiter, judge, referee, umpire, authority, and decider of the
required accuracy was satisfied.
Nothing obligates controllers to say anything when they are dissatisfied with
a pilot's performance, and indeed, as long as there is no influence on their
assigned tasks, they tend to remain silent.
Mxsmanic
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Mxsmanic
Find all threads started by Mxsmanic