"Gord Beaman" ) wrote in
:

Jim Yanik wrote:



People seem to come up with any excuse or farfetched or unlikely
scenario in order to make an argument against armed pilots.Very
irrational.

While you are of just the opposite bent. Why not discuss the
different offerings and try to pick the most effective/safest all
around method?. Nobody doubts your gun knowledge here but you
certainly can appear strident and unreasonable when someone
argues against you.

And please don't say "I do not!", I'm merely telling you how you
come across.
--

-Gord.


I'm advocating the KISS principle.
Rather than spend lots of bucks on methods that can still be bypassed or
breached,armed pilots will be effective and inexpensive,*immediately
applicable*(a BIG positive),and in the long run,safer.
Much of some folks "no-guns" arguments are based more on biases or wrong
information.(IMO,more bias than anything else.)

Cockpit defense need not be rocket science.


--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net