View Single Post
  #20  
Old January 5th 04, 12:39 AM
Jarg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You seem to overlook the massive material assistance to the Soviet Union
starting in 1941 which contributed greatly to stemming the German successes,
the assistance to Britain staring in 1939 which may well have saved them
from conquest, not to mention the actions in North Africa, Italy, in the
skies over Europe, etc which greatly reduced Germany's capacity to wage war.
It is possible Russia could have won alone, but highly unlikely. And while
is is debatable, it seems pretty apparent to me that the United States could
have defeated the Soviet Union at the conclusion of WW2 had it needed to,
albeit at a very high cost.

Jarg

"Alejandro Magno" wrote in message
om...
(BUFDRVR) wrote in message

...
You should be grateful to Mother Russia, it was Mother Russia who
defeated the Nazis, otherwise there would be a swastika flying on the
top of the White House in Washington, DC, and on the Tower of London.


I beg all the readers of this to *not* re-open that debate!! There is no
conclusive evidence either way and all we get are the resident kooks

like our
friend here throwing around insults....


There is no debate. Soviet Union won the war in Europe. Stalingrad the
largest battle in the history. Kurks the largest tank battle.

America entered the war in Europe in summer 1944 when Germany was in
constant retreat from the Eastern front since summer 1943. Hitler
started to execute Jews in 1942(after the Wannasse conference),
America did nothing for the Jews.

The only reason of D-Day was to stop uncle Joe Stalin from washing his
boots on the Portugal coast. "Clash of Titans" from Amazon.com

In other words, D-Day was the first confrontation of the Cold War.


Great, so not only are you a Russian/Soviet fanatic, but a racist to
boot.........
BUFDRVR


I am proud of my relatives and ancestors, are you ?

Magno