Spin recovery vs tail design
On May 11, 3:19*pm, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:19:26 +0200, John Smith
wrote:
C of G ist critical for spin entry, but for recovering from a sustained
spin, mass distribution is far more important. (The rudder force must
overcome the angular momentum.)
Interesting noone has mentiond flap setting yet - setting the flaps to
negative is by far the best way to quicken up the spin recovery.
I guess pretty many pilots here have flown the ASW-20 - recovering it
with setting 4 (zhermal setting) with a medium to rearward CG ca take
up to 2 turns, but with flaps 1 (fully negative) recovery takes at
maximum 0.75 turns.
Bye
Andreas
Not surprising at all - it would surprise me if anybody really wants
to teach this. Lets see -
- A desire to teach a standardized recovery
- Don't distract people with grabbing for a handle while under stress
(or if not stress just physically being thrown around a little)
- Likelyhood of grabbing the wrong handle (esp. if transitioning from
another ship) and just moving it (i.e. opening full spoilers)
- With full negative flap what happens to increased likelihood of
entering another/reverse spin if the pilot recovers too "hard"?
Darryl
|