From: Chad Irby
Date: 1/6/2004 12:10 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: m

In article ,
"weary" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote in message
. com...
In article ,
"weary" wrote:

In Hiroshima the aiming point was in a largely residential area and
the targetting selection required that the military target be in a
large urban area.

You know, you keep saying this, and while true in one respect (there
were a lot of homes in the area), it was a great aim point for hitting
the major military targets in Hiroshima, along with the local City Hall
and Prefectural offices.

What was the military value in such targets?

Besides a lot of soldiers, a lot of equipment, and being the main
military command center for that part of the island?

And the civilian centers were, as you should know, pre-empted by the
military, too.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com


Forget it , Chad, he simply doesn't understand war, economy or anything else
anyone has said to him. He has his mind set on the fluffy side of war.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired