Brian Whatcott wrote:
Jackie wrote:
I understand that ATC radar uses an encoding altimeter and a
transponder operating with Mode C to determine an aircraft's
altitude. Let's forget about Mode C for a moment and switch to Mode A
only or just a primary return.

If an aircraft is at 18,000 ft (approx 3 nm) and 3 nm away from the
radar antenna, as seen on a map, how does the radar correct for slant
distance when distance is displayed (e.g. using concentric circle
distance markers on the scope or relative to a known distance, such as
a marker on the display)?

In other words how does the radar know that the aircraft is actually 3
nm away laterally and not 4.25 nm (approx slant distance at that
altitude)?


I am late into the thread.
But you are presumably talking about an area surveillance radar.
Its fan beam does not typically stick 45 degrees up into the sky. Too
wasteful of energy.

That's interesting. So if what you say is correct, an airport
surveillance radar has very little coverage of the area, say at the top
of a class B airspace because to cover that high an angle is "wasteful."
For example, a VFR plane flying legally just above the B ceiling could
very well be out of coverage of the radar that is supposed to be also
monitoring another high performance aircraft poking through that ceiling
at a high rate of speed. I'm not sure I agree with such an energy
saving measure.

Another concept to ponder: if its beam WERE able to steer up at 45
degrees or more, what do you think its path would look like on a plan
position indicator? (a regular display). You've mentioned its slant
range is 4.25 miles at 3 mile distance horizontally. 30 seconds later,
it might be overhead: where would it paint in terms of range?
Three miles?? A circular range ring at 3 miles, all round the display?

My distances where small to keep the math simple for discussion
purposes, not to suggest what an actual display would include. Geez.