"jo" == jan olieslagers writes:

jo OK OK thanks but that wasn't really my question. Excuse me if
jo I wasn't clear enough, what I really meant to ask is "when
jo designing a plane, need I be concerned about the Reynolds
jo number

jo PS1 I am very happy with the tone of this discussion: only
jo positive reactions,

Hmmm. This may be the first negative one. If someone doesn't
understand Re, should they be designing an airplane? I don't think
one can pick up sufficient fluid and structural mechanics on Usenet to
be a reliable aircraft designer.
--
Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress;
but I repeat myself.
~ Mark Twain