Thread
:
I would not have thought this was possible
View Single Post
#
20
July 13th 09, 05:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mike Ash
external usenet poster
Posts: 299
I would not have thought this was possible
In article
,
wrote:
On Jul 11, 4:01 pm, Mike Ash wrote:
It's easy to be taken in by it, I agree, but I think that once you come
to the proper realizations it's not too hard to see that it must be
fake. To me, the most damning mistake in the video is the fact that the
plane sits perfectly level after the landing. Wings are *heavy*. Having
only one would make that plane tip right over onto its wingtip. Once I
realized what I was looking at, this to me was ironclad proof that they
were filming a plane with two intact wings, with the angle cleverly
chosen to hide one, and the rest done by some special effects trickery.
We regularly take wings off airplanes for repairs of one sort or
another. The airplane does NOT tip onto its other wingtip. The density
of wing structures is very light; like most of the rest of the
airframe, it's nearly all airspace. A 172's wing weighs maybe 70 or 80
pounds, max.
Huh, I never would have guessed. Even a relatively (compared to a 172)
light single-place glider has wings much heavier than that. Maybe
that'll teach me to generalize where it's not appropriate.
However, doesn't that assume that it's empty of fuel? I assume having
fuel in the tanks would change the picture substantially.
--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
Mike Ash
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Mike Ash
Find all threads started by Mike Ash