Thread
:
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements)
View Single Post
#
95
January 10th 04, 04:57 PM
B2431
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
From: Charles Gray
Date: 1/9/2004 11:41 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
On 06 Jan 2004 08:53:05 GMT,
(B2431) wrote:
From: "weary"
Date: 1/6/2004 12:37 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "weary"
Date: 1/1/2004 2:52 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 02:06:46 GMT, "weary" wrote:
I do regret the civilian losses in Nagasaki and Hiroshima but none of the
other
options would have saved lives. Not one.
That is your opinion - I interpret the facts differently.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
What facts?
Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
We had pixies working for us who would have scattered magic dust on
the military targets?
Or perhaps our secret alliance with the Martian empire would have
come into play?
Those are the only "Facts" I can think of, becasue there sure aren't
any others lying around that back his point.
I gave up on weary some time ago. He doesn't have the ability to grasp the fact
that urban targets are valid when they contain legitimate military targets,
that regardless of actions to end the war many thousands of people would have
died and that his constantly saying he knows the "facts" that apparently no one
else knows proves nothing.
Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired
B2431