"rich" wrote in message
...
My homebuilt's master contactor is going bad. Sometimes when I turn it
on it doesn't make connection. It's got 1700 hours on it, so I'd just
as soon replace it. But the way the builder wired it, he's has
positive power from the battery going through the master switch to the
small terminal on the contactor. (cole-Hersey type) But the master
contactors, such as Spruce sells, are set up to actuate with ground
power going to the small terminal. They also have plastic around their
mounting feet so their case doesn't make ground. A starter contactor
would work perfectly with the way the plane is wired. I just wonder,
are starter contactors made to withstand continous use, like a master
contactor does? And how can one tell the difference in the two, they
look identical? And if not, can the master/continuous duty type be
made to work with postitive power to the small terminal?

I've been reading this thread with modest interest and a little amusement.

At the moment, I am not entirely sure why a "typical" homebuilt would use a
master contactor and I suggest that you take a look at what the professional
designers may have done. For example, to the best of my recollection, the
Cessna 150 and 152 and also the Piper Tomahawk had starter contactors (a/k/a
solenoids) and a had master breakers that also functioned as switches; but
did not have master contactors--and I really have difficulty understanding
why a well designed aircraft in that size and weight range would need one.

I suggest that you determine whether your battery is located in an unusual
way and then ask a mechanic what was used in reasonably similar factory
built aircraft. For example: I would certainly expect a master contactor
in a Piper Cheyene; but I would not extpect to find one in a Cherokee 140.

Of course, as always, YMMV.

Peter