Beryl wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a
Ph.D. in Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could
Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics would as well.
Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident.
You're simply dishonest.

LOL

Step-by-step now, just for Alan.

No, it's worse than I thought.


A = An A&P guy is a dummy
B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well
C = An A&P guy could be a dummy
D = A PhD guy is a dummy

A and B That's it, my statement.


if C then D
C therefore D
That's your understanding of it.