View Single Post
  #6  
Old December 10th 09, 05:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Beryl wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a
Ph.D. in Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could
Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics would as well.
Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident.
You're simply dishonest.

LOL


Step-by-step now, just for Alan.


No, it's worse than I thought.


A = An A&P guy is a dummy
B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well

C = An A&P guy could be a dummy
D = A PhD guy is a dummy

A and B That's it, my statement.



if C then D
C therefore D
That's your understanding of it.


LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg