Clark wrote:
|| Colin Campbell (remove underscore)
|| wrote in :
||
||| On 17 Jan 2004 03:45:40 GMT, Clark stillnospam@me wrote:
|||
|||
||||| Why should I? I had this all explained to me in a class taught
||||| by a JAG lawyer.
|||||
|||| Is it possible that you either misunderstood the JAG lawyer or the
|||| JAG lawyer was in error? It wouldn't be the first time for either
|||| case now would it?
|||
||| And why should I regard you as more knowledgable than the course
||| materials?
||
|| Why shouldn't you question course material?
||
|||
||| On one hand I have an expert on military law. On the other hand -
||| you.
||
|| I have consulted lawyers who are officers of the court. Also, I'm
|| not limited by your "training" to see the world only one way.
||
|||
||| What makes you so sure that you know more about this than I do?
|||
|| Reality. Read the pertinent case law or admit the possibility that
|| there are other, quite valid, positions in the argument. Continuing
|| to argue without looking at the question from several angles will
|| get you nowhere. I've already pointed out that you've overlooked the
|| basic source of all arresting authority: citizens arrest...

Please post the citations for the 'pertinent case law'? I'd like to take a
look at them, they are cases involving military police and civilians, right?