Frontline documentary on the problems with regionals
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
		
In article , 
 Mxsmanic  wrote: 
 
  Does the safety record really make a difference?  
  
 For a substantial minority of passengers (a 30-50%, I'd guess), it does make  
 a 
 difference, if they are made aware of the safety record. Many people have had 
 it drilled into them that airline travel is completely, totally safe,  
 however, 
 and probably don't ask themselves any questions today. The problem is that, 
 while air travel is very safe, it isn't completely safe, and the differences 
 in safety between a major airline and a regional are real and significant. 
 
 So, if they care, they would find out who is running the flight and  
stay away. Most of the websites I have looked around on tell you at  
least the aircraft and mostly the carrier if it is other than the  
airline itself.  If anyone is interested all they really have to do is  
stay on equipment from Boeing or Airbus and they should be with the  
"real" airlines.  
 
 
  
 Airlines and the airline industry deliberately avoid all discussion of  
 safety, 
 and won't even talk about relative safety. They tell everyone that it's  
 always 
 110% safe everywhere, with no difference between carriers. But there are 
 differences.     
     That Dateline, USA Today, the NYT, the AP and a multitude of other  
sources point out from time to time. 
 
--  
I get off on '57 Chevys 
I get off on screamin' guitars 
      --Eric Clapton 
 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
			
 
			
			
			
				 
            
			
			
            
            
                
			
			
		 
		
	
	
	 |