"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

" wrote in message
hlink.net...


Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Colin Campbell" (remove
underscore)
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:31:43 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote:


RTO Trainer is absolutely correct. Iraqi Soldiers and
guerrillas who fall under the following definition are
considered Prisoners of War.

Wrong, but thanks for playing.

Then tell us why you think he is wrong.

The boys at gitmo are not POWs.

We are speaking here of Iraqi Soldiers and Guerrillas. Who,
for your information,

Nice editing, but that is not what we are discussing.

Now, back to military police arrest of people.

The Gitmos are NOT POWs. If they were, certain rights would be available to
them. POW status is give to those that fulfill that status. And since
Afganistan is no longer considered a War, POWs would have to be released.
They don't have rights because they took up arms outside of the rules that
would make them soldiers. Terrorist do not get the same rights. Now, if
Cuba were to sue to instate their own laws since it's their property it
might be different. But I doubt very seriously that any there would want to
be under Castros laws. It might make a very long, slow, painful death.
Wait, that might not be a bad idea afterall.