"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still
wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.

I know...ain't life a bitch John

It is amazing that Knoyle would spend so much time and money on an archive
troll about pitot tubes, when he never knew what one was.

Tell us about those mud wasps again, Splaps.

I need not go any further village idiot, Knoyle.

Your archive troll is purely a demonstration of your own stupidity,
finally
revealed for all to see.

Then tell us about the squadron of jets lost off Florida
because they didn't have P1T0 tubes!

"Well no actually, there is no pitot tube on a 727, only a screened over
pitot static port.
But thanks for being an idiot once again.
No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."
John Tarver