On Mar 29, 2:06*pm, Darryl Ramm wrote:

I have trouble seeing this was a good idea, since other software
handles this differently, but hopefully everybody (especially JJ)
knows about it now :-)

Darryl- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, I remember that discussion now. However it seems, from a quick
scan of a GNII database and the same database produced for SN10, that
TP Exchange just adds an L for every A. The user now has to purge
the unwanted L instead of the alternate task of purging the unwanted
A.

All the more reason for my seach for an internationally agreed
standard for what the attibutes are and what they mean.

My motivation for this search is that I am a beta tester for LK8000
and want to have a reliable source for any guidance I provide on
database attribute usage.

Andy