Kevin Brooks wrote:

OK, let me say this very slowly so you might get a clue:
it...takes...a....chemical...nuclear...or...biolog ical..
.warhead...to...make....it...a...WMD.
Conventional warheads carried by a Scud-wanna-be don't
meet the criteria.

Then why was Iraq prohibited from having scuds, regardless of the
payload?

Or is it a double standard?

(Iraq with empty scuds) = WMD

(Any other country with scuds with conventional warhead) =/= WMD