"None" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Jarg" wrote in message
om...

"Werner J. Severin" wrote in message



...
In article
,
Mike1 wrote:


Is anyone in disagreement with the basic *fact* that Saddam Hussein
used
chemical weapons to murder thousands of Kurds and Iranians in the
course
of slaughtering nearly a million people overall?


Is anyone in disagreement with the basic "fact" that the United States
provided the chemicals, weapons, intelligence, and tacit agreement
that
allowed Saddam Hussein to murder thousands of Kurds and Iranians?

Even if this were true, what is your point? Are you suggesting that
past
support for Iraq means the US should not have removed the Saddam
regime?

Jarg

Of course not, but neither should anyone have to put up with the bull****
lies about who built up Iraq's chemical weapons in the first place,
whether
we did it directly or through the cloak of another country. We paid to
build him up, and again, we paid to tear it down, now we get to pay to
rebuild what we tore down.

It's a pathetic and vicious circle we keep jerking in.



But perhaps this will end it.

Jarg