On May 19, 7:06*am, Alpha Propellerhead wrote:
On May 16, 5:28*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:

george writes:
By flying and training with instructors who actually fly..

If the instructor or student makes a mistake, then what?

They die. They don't reboot the computer and try again. That's the
difference. If I teach somebody incorrectly they may die, and I may
die with them. My life and my family's well-being is on the line every
time I go to work, which is why when some non-flying twit who's never
actually flown an airplane starts contradicting pilots and instructors
in a flying forum, it's worthy contempt, ridicule and exposure as a
perfect example of willful ignorance. *Go fly around a few circuits
around a traffic pattern sometime like all students do on Training Day
One and you'll begin to have the capacity to understand. But you have
a stated lack of willingness to do even -that-.

Flying is safe if you do it masterfully and deadly if you do not. The
aviators out here, student or ATP, have demonstrated their mettle by
the fact that they're alive to tell about it.

That's why instructors and pilots out here keep telling you that
you're full of ****. You have no idea where your lack of understanding
even begins and you don't listen when people try to tell you civilly.
I used to defend you and try to explain it to you, but, all of us have
learned that you're not interested in learning, you're interested in
telling everybody how much you know about everything.

Do airline pilots train for spin recovery in their airliners?

Just about every living airline pilot has demonstrated spin recovery
in one aircraft or another. Your options in a spin are to do nothing
and die, or do something and try to recover. Some airplanes do not
recover from spins predictably or without the potential for structural
damage, so, pilots don't spin every airplane the fly.

I let that one go as I have a life outside the Internet.
Well answered.
Fully developed stall recovery is in the PPL/CPL training regime.
I suppose to mixedup that doesn't count