On Jun 30, 9:48*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:
George is right and YOU are WRONG. WRONG AND SO WRONG.

How many hours do you have flying 747s again?

Doesn't matter how many hours I have. A 747 without engines is a
glider.

emergency (I bet Sully never types in uppercase). Sullenberger's glider rating
had little to do with it, any more than his experience flying F-4s.

YOU DON"T FLY a real plane. YOU DON'T know from real world
experience. MY UPPER CASE DOESN"T change the fact you are wrong. It
just helps point out the fact. It' was Sully's glider rating that got
him down. YES, that so called lowly rating beneath you because you
can't keep up with a pokey C172.

LET ME REMIND YOU AGAIN, a 747 WITHOUT working engines is a glider.
WHAT PART OF THAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

You're confusing the laws of physics with the rules and procedures of flying.

DID YOU NOT SAY FLYING is using a yoke and rudder????? The basics of
flying is the same, you pull back on the stick you go up? You push
forward, you go down. A 747 with 4 dead engines is the same as the
Blanic I fly.

Or is it because YOU have no clue what you are talking about.