On Jun 30, 11:37*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:39:34 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 30, 10:35*pm, Wingnut wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 08:25:12 -0700, Dudley Henriques wrote:
On Jun 29, 5:59*am, Wingnut wrote:

Suffice it to say that I am growing weary of these unprovoked
attacks from Mxsmanic and Dudley Henriques. I did nothing to provoke
these relentless and unpleasant criticisms.

Dudley Henriques wrote;

I have no opinion of you at all really. You simply come with Usenet.
No problem at all. You have as much right to an opinion here as
anyone here. *:-))))))))
Dudley Henriques

Interesting logic trail you have going here. I admit I'm a bit
puzzled to discover exactly where you are finding all these
"relentless and unpleasant criticisms".

Mainly in Mxsmanic's posts, but you did at least once suggest that I
was a liar, whether you intended to or not.

I'd like to see that quote when you get a moment to find it. In all the
years I've been here on this forum I can't recall ever calling or
inferring that someone was a liar.

It was in your post of June 28, at 11:13 am. It was a response to one of
my posts countering one of Mxsmanic's, and it implied (though it didn't
state outright) that I was lying on the topic of how much experience was
implied by a commercial license.

I repeat for the record that at no time have I lied or otherwise acted
dishonestly here.

I just read the post you have referenced. It shows on my reader as
post #256 in answer to your post referencing "Cessna strawmen".
I'll be completely honest with you Wingnut, I don't believe any
reasonable person reading my response to you will find anything even
remotely coming close to calling you a "liar". I did disagree with
your basic premise about the Cessna reference, and I even went VERY
much out of my way to include not only a smile emoticon for you before
submitting my comment but a LONG smile emoticon to emphasize the non
aggressive nature of my response.

I do realize at this point that you are obviously taking dissenting
comment by others to indicate a personal attack directed at you. I can
only tell you that in my case at least, you are grossly mistaken.
I also believe I've spent enough time dealing with this non-issue, and
suggest we drop it at this point and move on to more productive
discussion.
Dudley Henriques