On Jun 16, 11:48*am, Andy wrote:
SSA contest report indicates that 2 gliders made contact on the first
day. *If the gliders are identified correctly then one continued to
win the day and the other returned to the airport missing part of one
wing and so far has no log posted.

Any more information available?

Andy.

Maybe worth noting that there was also a mid-air collision at the 31st
Worlds on Day 1 (4th July) between two standard class gliders which
was also caught on IGC flight logs. According to the contest web site
both gliders were able to land and the pilots are OK. See flight logs
for 8K and GX (reported as FX on the score sheet).

According to the contest site, one glider had an anti-collision
device, presumably Flarm, the other did not. One glider was thermaling
and the other appears to join the thermal (or at least try to avoid
the thermal circle?) but misjudges and there is a collision. That
pilot had the day disqualified and a two day suspension for what the
CD determined was dangerous flying.

As with the Parowan mid-air there was a gaggle stacked up above the
collision point and the collision involves at least one of the gliders
entering the thermal. Likely a lot of gliders to look at and I wonder
in both cases how much the pilots may have been distracted from seeing
the gliders at the same altitude by looking up at the gaggle above to
help judge the thermal location.

And as discussed in this thread earlier, continuing on task after a
collision is specifically not allowed by FAI rules (Annex A 4.1.4).
Here one glider did continue back to the contest airport/finish. He
was already on the final leg but did seem to pass up several other
closer options to land. I wonder how the CD interprets the 4.1.4 "land
as soon as practicable" requirement, but moot in this case since the
pilot was disqualified anyhow. I mention that only to point it out,
not to judge, without knowing the condition of the glider and
facilities available at the landing sites I do not know what I would
do.


Darryl