Quote:
Originally Posted by Surfer![_2_]
...
snip
OK.....But the same BASIC technique works for all these
gliders............LOW ENERGY LANDING.......
This is a fascinating and slightly scary discussion.
I was taught in the UK the BGA way, and the only kind of landing I have been
taught is the fully-held off one - ultimately the glider mushes onto th
ground. Flying on is not considered good as it's all too easy to end up
airborne again if there are lumps and bumps, and the average grass strip or
field usually has plenty of those. Landing in less than 200m is not hard in
just about any glass ship so long as approach speed control was good and
there was at least 1/2 airbrake used. The touchdown is either main wheel
and tail wheel/skid at the same time or tail slightly first. Then it's
right back with the stick (which is just about where it will be if the
landing was really held off) to help keep the ship on the ground, and also
to keep the tail wheel/skid planted as long as possible on things like K21s
to aid directional stability if there is a cross-wind.
Is this what US folks mean by a low-energy landing? If not, what is meant?
|
Same way I was taught to land. Works ok. Last OFL was in a Nimbus 3d into a 150m long field over a farm fence. Got it down and stopped in 135m. Duo x that landed before me about 5m less. The nose did touch the ground from some heavy braking at the end of the ground roll but only dirt/mud to clean off. In the picture the crooked trace is the Duo being pushed to the side as I was landing
Colin