On Sep 20, 1:19*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 19, 6:26*pm, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sep 19, 10:46*am, wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:29:11 -0700 (PDT), george wrote:
On Sep 19, 4:22*am, Mark wrote:
Ok, it's the year 2025. If man is still alive.
You are in a little Cessna 150.
Why the obsession with the C150 ?
Why not one of the newer glass machines much lighter and could be
purpose built for your fantasy
Jim the Pinhead says I can't modify an LSA.
And so does the FAA.
Wrong.
But my space suit design wouldn't fit in their vertically challenged
cockpit.
If you are wearing a space suit, why would the cockpit have to be enclosed?
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
Hey Jim, do you really have time to debate a non pilot troll
that forges my identity and baits people? That is Jeffrey
Bloss.
Sounds like your idiocy to me.
--
Jim Pennino
NASA - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
"Future advanced aircraft fueled by hydrogen are being developed to
use electric drive systems instead of gas turbine engines for
propulsion. Current conventional electric motor power densities cannot
match those of today’s gas turbine aircraft engines. However, if
significant technological advances could be made in high-power-density
motor development, the benefits of an electric propulsion system, such
as the reduction of harmful emissions, could be realized."
http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/RT/2004/...S-johnson.html
---
Mark
Translation: Give us money.
--
Jim Pennino
Why, if he only wants money, would he have actually
performed advanced turbodynamic engineering and
applied mathematics which solved the difficult
criteria to satisfy this remarkable threshold which
the world community has requested and which he
has already been paid for? Why prove an advanced
breakthrough which has all the funded support one
could want from the executive branch of our govt?
Wouldn't it be much, much more lucrative to simply
engineer wickets and gizmos and hawk them on
infomercials like Ron Popeil? Why do you assert
that everyone working on advanced new technology
involving renewable resources is a disingenuous
charlatan? If all these people are insincere liars
and thieves, why doesn't the general accounting
office or a consumer protection advocacy group
file lawsuits against to stop this pilfering of our
tax dollars?
Are you unable to see any advantages to this
described and proven technology if hydrogen were
as plentiful as jet fuel, when view even hypothetically?
---
Mark