View Single Post
  #6  
Old February 4th 04, 10:42 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Spiv" wrote in message
...

"Peter Stickney" wrote in message
...


Two mendium range turboprops,
(Brittania and Vanguard), which not
only undercut each other, but were
so long delayed that they had no market
niche when they finally went
into service.

They sold well enough and filled the niche they intended too. The

British
have made planes that were better than their US equivalents: VC10 v

707,
Britannia v other US props, BAC 1-11 v DC9, etc, but never sold that

well
because US companies could keep prices down because they had larger
production lines as US carriers preferred them.


Let's see: 60 Commercial Britannias,


No. 85 built.


23 of which went to the RAF and 2 prototypes paid for by the
ministry of works, that does indeed leave 60 sold to
commercial operators


Not that we didn't have our share of flops. The Boeing 377
Stratocruiser, with its turbosupercharged R4360s and advanced systems,
required much more maintenance hours than the L.1049 Constellation, or
the DC-7. So only about 50 were made. (However, as the KC-97 (Model
367), flown by the U.S. Air Force, who didn't mind doing the
maintenance, it got built to the tune of 888 airframes.)

The VC.10 Superior?


Yep.

Well, if you count moving fewer passengers a
shorter distance slower, while burning more fuel/mile, I suppose you
could say that. (To be fair, the VC.10 did have a shorter takeoff
roll, but by the tim it came out, runways had been extended so that
that wasn't relevant any more.)


The Super VC10 was larger and any problems ironed out.


And yet only 22 were ever sold


The BAC 1-11 was a neat little jet, but, unfortunately, it was a
_little_, short-legged jet. Just the thing for tooling between the
U.K. and Brussels, but not as economical as the DC-9 or the 737 over
the type of Stage Lengths that the rest of teh world required.


The BAC 1-11 was a massive seller.



Total One-Eleven production amounted to 235 aircraft which
was certainly respectable but doesnt compare that well
with the sales of the DC-9 (976) or Boeing 727 (1832)
let alone the 737 (4300)

Keith