Thread
:
THE PILOT WHO WOULDN'T FLY
View Single Post
#
1
February 7th 04, 03:35 AM
Mike Marron
external usenet poster
Posts: n/a
(BUFDRVR) wrote:
Mike Marron wrote:
That's a big difference though.
I disagree. The only difference is I use the intercom vis the radio to
coordinate with my team.
OK. If you say so.
It's beyond me why anyone would
choose a multi-engined bomber, trash hauler, whirlybird, or whatever
vis a vis a single-seat fighter (or a single-seat *anything*).
I chose a BUFF over an F-16 and an F-15C, in fact the only difficulty I may
have had in chosing would have been if an F-15E were available, and even then I
think I would have taken the BUFF. I'm the opposite of you, for the life of me, I can't
figure out why anyone would take a fighter, particularly an F-15C.
Er um, you need your fuggen head examined boy!
Sure you have a great time at RED FLAG, but when it comes time for the real deal,
you're a spectator.
Huh?
As for the fighters that employ air-ground ordnance; if you aren't carrying double
digits(in number of weapons), you're just a bomber want to be
Beam me up Scotty!!
)
Mike Marron