On Dec 5, 1:26*pm, Andy wrote:
On Dec 5, 11:00*am, lanebush wrote:

I am compelled to make a distinction between properly complying with
the regulations and being in a noncompliance state. *

Well I read all your post several times but I don't see where you make
that distinction. *Seems to me the two are equivalent in that failing
to do one will always result in the other.

I just spent over an hour going through the sections of Order 8130.2G
that apply to group 1, and then reviewing my Operating Limitations.
It is clear to me that my operating limitations do not comply with the
group 1 requirements of 4113. They have several paragraphs that are
not currently called out by the order and others do not match the
wording of the boilerplate.

I'm also puzzled by the fact that 4110 assigns a requirement for a
geographic area only to groups 6 and 7. * I don't see a requirement
for a defined geographic area for group 1 (except for phase 1 flight
test). *Did I miss it or is this something that has changed since my
operating limitations were issued in 2002. *Did the 300nm radius
requirement go away?

No, I don't plan to call my local FSDO, but I will have a copy of
Order 8130.2G on hand if/when I become the target of a FSDO
inspection.

Andy

The following web site has some good info on aircraft certification.
Two weeks ago I met with an Atlanta FSDO inspector and we rewrote my
operating limitations to clean up some outdated language. The 300
mile radius was in effect at that time. Try this website for more
info http://www.faa-aircraft-certificatio...ir-racing.html

Lane
XF