Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy[_1_]
On Jan 8, 10:20*pm, Timinnc
wrote:
All my training in a G103. Looking for a decent glass ship under $20k.
Looking seriously at 15b or Jantar Std 2 or Standard 41a. Any big
differences between the Jantar choices? I get that the 15b will likely
climb better in weak lift but the Jantars will dust the 15b when XC. I
am 6'1" and have long arms, so a Jantar should not be a problem for me.
I know I can't go wrong with the 15b but there is the gelcoat issue...
and if I want to get into XC any time soon the Jantar will do better.
Comes down to condition of plane and trailer for what can be purchased
under $20k. So an opinion about any and all of the planes mentioned
would be good with emphasis on the performance difference regarding the
Jantar 41a (Standard) and 48-1 (Standard 2). THANKS
--
Timinnc
Never flew the -2 but it was reputed to have better performance than
the original Jantar Std. The (original) Jantar Std was my first
glass ship (leased not owned) and I did all my Gold and Diamond
flights in it. I didn't realize how much of a dog it was until I
bought my ASW-19b! Of course had I not had the opportunity of the
very low cost lease I may never have got into XC and contest flying.
Any glider is better than no glider and I learned a lot in it.
BTW the trailer on that glider sucked but it had no influence on how
often I flew, or where I went. I didn't know any better.
Andy (GY)
|
Thanks Andy, but I love dogs... I have 5!..... and I have been told that the Jantar Std 2 is quite comparable to a 19 and some even like it better.... but can you qualify what makes a Std (41a) a dog? And it might be said that an ASW 15 is a dog compared to a 19..... But this is my first glider and another way to ask my original question is if everything is equal with regards to trailer, finish, instruments, etc. and the price the same.... would you choose a Jantar 41 over a 15b? And part two of the question still stands.... is there quite a bit of difference between a 41a and 48-1 (std 2).... But thanks for the input.