On Jan 26, 6:56*am, John Cochrane
wrote:
Is there any way to hijack this thread back to Rick's post? Mandatory
flarm vs 99% voluntary at Uvalde, how Flarm will make euro and us
flarms interoperable (of course they will), *FCC legalities, how US
Uvalde organizers will handle flarm are non-issues that *none of us
knows anything about.

Rick asked about the insane (my opinion) 13.5 meter class, including
the momentous issue of water ballast. I responded with, let's split
club in two instead. He asked about handicaps in Arcus class (sorry,
20 m double seat), wgc locations, various "safety" measures. All these
and more seem like far more important and contentious items on the IGC
agenda.

Can't we give him and other IGC delegates some more useful feedback
before the meeting?

John Cochrane

Is it surprising that the majority of posts relate to the question
that was posed in the thread title?

Maybe the way to promote discussion of the other issues would be to
start new threads with appropriate titles?

Andy