"Leslie Swartz" wrote in message
...
Kerry is the perfect democratic nominee for 2004: he will lose by a wide
margin, on his (popular with democratic base) anti-war, anti-defense,
anti-us sovreignty issues.

Now that there are signs Kerry was nailing interns, Dean may find new life.
It seems Clark blew the whistle on John Kerry.

This crushing defeat on the basis of core-democrat party issues will
further
energize the base, setting St. Billary up for 2008. (Know how much
mileage
teh democrats fgot on their "stole the election" myth? This goes away in
2004, and must be replaced with something equally powerful.)

A phoenix rises from the ashes.

McAuliffe may be a lot of things, but he is no fool.

I think McAuliffe is a retard; a Neil Bush like dupe.

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
...
S. Sampson wrote:
"George Z. Bush" wrote
S. Sampson wrote:
"Stephen Harding" wrote

I think many people of 1970 would never have believed being
anti-war would be a negative attribute in the future.

It was more than anti-war. Kerry was against representative
government,
and thought that a vocal minority should have more power than the
silent
majority of the republic. He was anti-government. His view of
government,
like all communists, is that a Central Planning Authority should
distribute
the revenue to the communes (Party organs), rather than
capitalists
determining what was viable based on the market. It's the classic
serfdom
versus freedom struggle (communists versus capitalists).

Kerry's voting record is pure communism. He is a communist.

You got any way of proving any of what you're saying

Yes.

or are you making it all up as you go along?

No.

So, how about sharing your proof with us?

Soon enough, George.

McAuliffe should have left the lid on this can of worms.