In article W1mpb.92051$e01.325484@attbi_s02,
Juan.Jimenez wrote:

Tell ya what, I've taken pity on ya -- one title showing your name as sole
owner of any vehicle, instead of a truck, and one piece of proof it was in
Lakeland for SnF since George Conn won a judgement against you.

Tell ya what, I've taken pityt on *you*, Juan -- One piece of documentation
showing that he did *NOT* own any vehicle, and one piece of proof that it
was _not_ at Lakeland for SnF.

*YOU* made the claim, _YOU_ must provide the "proof".

That's all that's needed to rebut the claim that *YOU* are a liar and
a fraud.

If you don't have it, all you have to do is admit you lied and apologize.
And since you're so fond of bets, $1 sez you won't admit you lied and you
won't apologize.

If you don't have it, all you have to do is admit you lied, and apologize.
I'll _up_ the ante. $10 sze you won't admit you lied, and you won't
apologize.

I won't hold my breath, but the buck is on the table.


I won't hold my breath, but the sawbuck is on the table.


"Juan.Jimenez" wrote in message
news:5Ylpb.92019$e01.325755@attbi_s02...
One title showing your name as sole owner of a truck, and one piece of
proof
showing it was in Lakeland for SnF.

It's all about credibility, the kind you don't have.