tim gueguen wrote:
"Stephen Harding" wrote in message
...

I'd just like to know how come we don't see anything derived from
these "crashed UFO's"? Keeping something secret and never actually
using it sort of defeats the purpose of having it.


A number of times I've clashed on Usenet with a fellow named Don Palermo.
He claims that UFOs are actually human designed craft and that the stories
of "Mr. ET" are simply to cover this up. Why don't we see open evidence of
such craft? According to Don "Its classified," as if merely uttering the
phrase explains everything. Apparentl,y the US has spent zillions of
dollars on "conventional" aircraft and so forth to hide the existence of
this technology, which is controlled by some ultrapowerful cabal, and which
apparently no one else has ever managed to stumble across

If we assume it is the military that is masking the existence
of super capable aircraft via "UFO's", will these aircraft
ever get put to uses beyond mere test flights?

Haven't come across stories from Kosovo or Iraq [yet] claiming
"a formation of UFO's" attacked some target.

Looks like the price of having super capable, advanced aircraft
representing a non-linear leap in technology, is to spend a lot
of money over a very long period of time, hiding their
existence, and never actually putting them to tactical or
strategic use!

Super high tech can be extremely limiting!


SMH